Thursday, May 10, 2012

English 10 Blogging Rubric

The following rubric is being used to assess your blog comments and responses and to assign you a numeric score towards your fourth quarter average.  If you have any questions about it, please ask them by posting them as comments.



Qualities Assessed
Excellent
(5 points)
Proficient
(4 points)
Developing
(3 points)
Unsatisfactory
(0-2 points)
Comprehension: the extent to which the response exhibits sound understanding and analysis of the assigned task and text.

-exhibits in-depth understanding by providing thoughtful reflection that cites strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis
-exhibits a  reasonable understanding by providing a sensible reflection that cites implicit and relevant textual evidence to support analysis
-exhibits a simple understanding by providing a basic reflection that may mention textual evidence but does adequately support analysis
-exhibits confused or incomplete understanding by providing minimal or inaccurate reflection that does not use textual evidence to support analysis

Analysis: the extent to which the assigned text is examined as the a basis for interpretation and discussion
- reveals what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text

-reveals what the text says literally as well as conclusions drawn from the text

-makes  superficial connections between the task and text
-may rely on summary of text
-reveals minimal or no examination of the chosen texts
-references to the text are vague, irrelevant,  or unjustified
Development: the
extent to which ideas
are elaborated using
specific and relevant
evidence from the
text
-develop ideas clearly and fully, making effective use of valid reasoning and a wide range of relevant and specific evidence
-develop ideas clearly and consistently, with valid reasoning and adequate reference to relevant and specific evidence
-develop some ideas more fully than others, using some reasoning and some evidence
from the text
- are incomplete or
largely undeveloped,
hinting at ideas, but
reasoning is flawed or off topic

Writing: the extent to which writing is clear, coherent, and appropriate to communication with peers and others (e.g. teacher) in an academic setting and on an important academic topic.
-use language that is
fluent and original, with evident awareness of
audience and purpose
- demonstrate control of the conventions with
essentially no language errors
-use appropriate
language, with some
awareness of  audience and purpose
--demonstrate control of the conventions,
exhibiting occasional
language errors
-rely on basic
vocabulary, with little awareness of audience or purpose
--demonstrate partial
control, exhibiting
several language errors
-use language that is
imprecise or inappropriate
for the audience or
purpose, or that is
incoherent
-demonstrate a lack of control, exhibiting
frequent errors that make comprehension difficult



No comments:

Post a Comment