The following rubric is being used to assess your blog comments and responses and to assign you a numeric score towards your fourth quarter average. If you have any questions about it, please ask them by posting them as comments.
Qualities Assessed
|
Excellent
(5 points)
|
Proficient
(4 points)
|
Developing
(3 points)
|
Unsatisfactory
(0-2 points)
|
Comprehension: the extent to which the response exhibits sound understanding and analysis of the assigned task and text.
|
-exhibits in-depth understanding by providing thoughtful reflection that cites strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis
|
-exhibits a reasonable understanding by providing a sensible reflection that cites implicit and relevant textual evidence to support analysis
|
-exhibits a simple understanding by providing a basic reflection that may mention textual evidence but does adequately support analysis
|
-exhibits confused or incomplete understanding by providing minimal or inaccurate reflection that does not use textual evidence to support analysis
|
Analysis: the extent to which the assigned text is examined as the a basis for interpretation and discussion
|
- reveals what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text
|
-reveals what the text says literally as well as conclusions drawn from the text
|
-makes superficial connections between the task and text
-may rely on summary of text
|
-reveals minimal or no examination of the chosen texts
-references to the text are vague, irrelevant, or unjustified
|
Development: the
extent to which ideas
are elaborated using
specific and relevant
evidence from the
text
|
-develop ideas clearly and fully, making effective use of valid reasoning and a wide range of relevant and specific evidence
|
-develop ideas clearly and consistently, with valid reasoning and adequate reference to relevant and specific evidence
|
-develop some ideas more fully than others, using some reasoning and some evidence
from the text
|
- are incomplete or
largely undeveloped,
hinting at ideas, but
reasoning is flawed or off topic
|
Writing: the extent to which writing is clear, coherent, and appropriate to communication with peers and others (e.g. teacher) in an academic setting and on an important academic topic.
|
-use language that is
fluent and original, with evident awareness of
audience and purpose
- demonstrate control of the conventions with
essentially no language errors
|
-use appropriate
language, with some
awareness of audience and purpose
--demonstrate control of the conventions,
exhibiting occasional
language errors
|
-rely on basic
vocabulary, with little awareness of audience or purpose
--demonstrate partial
control, exhibiting
several language errors
|
-use language that is
imprecise or inappropriate
for the audience or
purpose, or that is
incoherent
-demonstrate a lack of control, exhibiting
frequent errors that make comprehension difficult
|
No comments:
Post a Comment